Chestnut Hill Local Local Photo
LettersOpinionNewsLocal LifeobitsThis WeekSportsNews MakersAbout Us

January 5, 2006 Issue                                               

This Week's Issue
Previous Issues


this site web

Classified
Subscribe
E-Mail Us
Place a Classified Ad
Advertising Information
Links

Chestnut Hill Local
8434 Germantown Avenue
Philadelphia, PA 19118
215-248-8800
fax: 215-248-8814

Webmaster
E-mail: Nick Tsigos
215-248-8809

Don't Miss an Issue,
Subscribe to the Local!


Who Links Here

Tell us what you see or
what we are missing here.
Send an e-mail to
Interim Editor Carole Boynton.

©2005 Chestnut Hill Local

Winner of Three
2005 Keystone Award

subs

Don't Miss an Issue!

©2005 The Chestnut Hill Local

2005: The year in film (part one); several trenchant observations
by NATHAN LERNER

 

During the past year, I watched over 200 films. Some left me feeling exhilarated and transformed. Others evoked boredom and, in some instances, disgust. Here are a few observations, culled from the time that I spent in darkened theaters.

FILMMAKERS:

BREAKTHROUGH YEAR (FILMMAKER): Once dismissed as a pretty boy actor, George Clooney came into his own in 2005 with two strong films. He co-produced and directed Good Night, and Good Luck, in addition to lending his marquee value to the cast. He followed up by co-producing Syriana, in which he also portrayed a key character.

BEST YEAR (DIRECTOR): Still creatively fertile at 63, iconoclastic auteur, Werner Herzog, made two documentary gems, Grizzly Man and The White Diamond.

MOST UNEVEN YEAR (DIRECTOR): Is it possible that there are actually two Steven Spielbergs? In 2005, some guy(s) named Steven Spielberg, made the futuristic multiplex fodder, War of the Worlds, as well as the brilliantly crafted and conceptually provocative Munich. There must be two different individuals who coincidentally have the same name. Back in 1993, one of the doppelgangers was shooting Schindler’s List while the other was editing Jurassic Park. Do you think that they have the same middle initial?

MOST DISTINCTIVE STYLE (FILMMAKER):

The New World bears the unique signature of Terrence Malick. For better or worse, his visual panache and elliptical narrative approach are unmistakable.

MOST ATYPICAL STYLE (FILMMAKER):

Woody Allen’s oeuvre is distinguished by its humor, its Upper West side settings and the presence of the filmmaker or his analogue as a character in the film. His latest opus, Match Point, is a somber affair set in England. It is egregiously devoid of a nebbishy Jewish protagonist.

UPWARD CAREER ARC (FILMMAKER): Once upon a time, Paul Haggis churned out scripts for cheesy television sit-coms. Co-writing and directing Crash, he demonstrated that Million Dollar Baby, which he had scripted, was no fluke. It proves that there is life after Love Boat after all.

DOWNWARD CAREER ARC (FILMMAKER): Writer-director, Cameron Crowe, is acclaimed for such films as Say Anything and Almost Famous. This year, the critics’ darling betrayed his pedigree with the bizarrely bad Elizabethtown. It was a boring, annoying and misguided botch.

BEST DEBUT FILM (DIRECTOR): Bennett Miller helmed Capote with the self-assurance of a far more experienced director.

WRITING:

BEST SCREENPLAY (ORIGINAL): Innocent Voices was inspired by the reminiscences of first-time screenwriter, Oscar Torres. He co-wrote the screenplay with director, Luis Mandoki. The moving film, about the war in El Salvador, failed to garner the attention that it deserved.

BEST SCREENPLAY (ADAPTED): The screenplay for Munich, by Angels in America playwright Tony Kushner and Eric Roth (Forrest Gump), is drawn from George Jonas’ book, Vengence. The disarmingly literate script demonstrates a keen ear for dialogue, careful attention to plot mechanics and compelling characters.

CLIFF’S NOTES ARE A MUST: For Syriana, Stephen Gaghan created multiple storylines, which involve a panoply of characters (there are over 70 speaking parts). The narrative density and complexity of the plot required that viewers familiarize themselves with it before seeing the film.

WORST SCREENPLAY: The screenplay for The Ringer invoked a vile premise, then bludgeoned the viewer with its tastelessness in every single frame of the film from start to finish.

BEST DIALOGUE: The crisp dialogue in Munich captured the internal qualms of its characters without ever sermonizing.

WORST DIALOGUE: George Lucas may be a techno-wizard. However, the dialogue in Revenge of the Sith was once again putrid. It sounded like it was written by a lovelorn adolescent female.